Knjige Kerubina Šegvića
ex-iskon-pleme :: Društvo :: Povijest
Page 1 of 1
Knjige Kerubina Šegvića
Može li mi itko dati link ili mi preporučiti web stranicu ili kontakt neke knjižare koja bi u ponudi imala knjige Kerubina Šegvića? (najviše me zanima Gotsko Podrijetlo Hrvata, te bi ju htio kupiti) tnx
_________________
Heil! Le Pen!
Baron- Posts : 295
2014-04-15
Re: Knjige Kerubina Šegvića
Pisao je i Mužić o tome... http://docslide.net/documents/slaveni-goti-i-hrvati-na-teritoriju-rimske-provincije-dalmacije-ivan-muzic.html
Za Šegvića ne znam, možda ima u nekom antikvarijatu, teško u knjižnicama...
Za Šegvića ne znam, možda ima u nekom antikvarijatu, teško u knjižnicama...
Guest- Guest
Re: Knjige Kerubina Šegvića
Nešto o Gotima iz novije literature:
[size=32]Michael Kulikowski, Rome’s Gothic Wars from the third century to Alaric, 67-68
[/size]
"The answer, at least in my
view, is that there is no Gothic history before the third century. The
Goths are a product of the Roman frontier, just like the Franks and the
Alamanni who appear at the same time. That is clearly demonstrated by
contemporary literary evidence, and indeed all the evidence of the fourth
and fifth centuries – everything except the sixth-century Jordanes. In
the third century, the Roman empire was assaulted from the regions
north of the Danube and the Black Sea by large numbers of different
barbarian groups, among whom Goths appear for the first time. Not
long thereafter, the Goths are clearly the most powerful group in the
region, while most of the other barbarian groups with whom they appear
in the third century either disappear from the record or are clearly
subordinated to them. The most plausible explanation of this evidence is
to see one group among the many different barbarians north of the Black
view, is that there is no Gothic history before the third century. The
Goths are a product of the Roman frontier, just like the Franks and the
Alamanni who appear at the same time. That is clearly demonstrated by
contemporary literary evidence, and indeed all the evidence of the fourth
and fifth centuries – everything except the sixth-century Jordanes. In
the third century, the Roman empire was assaulted from the regions
north of the Danube and the Black Sea by large numbers of different
barbarian groups, among whom Goths appear for the first time. Not
long thereafter, the Goths are clearly the most powerful group in the
region, while most of the other barbarian groups with whom they appear
in the third century either disappear from the record or are clearly
subordinated to them. The most plausible explanation of this evidence is
to see one group among the many different barbarians north of the Black
Sea establishing its hegemony over the scattered and hitherto disparate
population of the region, which was thereafter regularly identified as
Gothic by Graeco-Roman observers.
The archaeological evidence of the Santana-de-Mures /Cernjachov ˇ
culture makes sense in these terms as well. The rise to prominence
of a few strong leaders created a stable political zone in which a single
material culture came into being, synthesized from a variety of disparate
traditions. None was more important than the others – as the material
evidence clearly shows – and there is no need to look for ‘original’
Goths coming from elsewhere to impose their leadership and their
identity on others. There were, of course, immigrants into the region
where the Santana-de-Mures/Cernjachov culture arose, from elsewhere
in northern and central Europe and from the steppe lands to the east
as well. But none of them need themselves have been Goths, because
there is no good evidence that Goths existed before the third century."
population of the region, which was thereafter regularly identified as
Gothic by Graeco-Roman observers.
The archaeological evidence of the Santana-de-Mures /Cernjachov ˇ
culture makes sense in these terms as well. The rise to prominence
of a few strong leaders created a stable political zone in which a single
material culture came into being, synthesized from a variety of disparate
traditions. None was more important than the others – as the material
evidence clearly shows – and there is no need to look for ‘original’
Goths coming from elsewhere to impose their leadership and their
identity on others. There were, of course, immigrants into the region
where the Santana-de-Mures/Cernjachov culture arose, from elsewhere
in northern and central Europe and from the steppe lands to the east
as well. But none of them need themselves have been Goths, because
there is no good evidence that Goths existed before the third century."
[size=32]Michael Kulikowski, Rome’s Gothic Wars from the third century to Alaric, 67-68
[/size]
Guest- Guest
Similar topics
» Knjige samopomoći?
» Džabe vam knjige kad ste glupi ko ...'
» Hasambegović financira knjige o Nediću
» Deuterokanonske knjige (ipak)su citirane u NZ
» TRUMP NAJAVLJUJE OSVETU ZBOG KNJIGE
» Džabe vam knjige kad ste glupi ko ...'
» Hasambegović financira knjige o Nediću
» Deuterokanonske knjige (ipak)su citirane u NZ
» TRUMP NAJAVLJUJE OSVETU ZBOG KNJIGE
ex-iskon-pleme :: Društvo :: Povijest
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum